-
You publish a review from 2013 to refute a meta-analysis with more data from 2017.
It is clear that you and others are failing to see my main point- which is clearly a failure on my part.
I don't want or think that compulsory helmets are necessary. Nor do I think they make cycling - in a city- as a whole- safer.All I intended was to post the most recent reviews, all of which- bar the one from Taiwan- show fairly consistently that helmet wearers have better outcomes in head, neck, facial injuries, hospital stay, and long term outcome.
I had hoped this would allow people to read some data rather than opinion and I would not be forced to comment further. I have now been forced to comment in light of repeated failures to comprehend my post- which as I said, is clearly my fault.
But never mind- keep arguing that I want a law for compulsory helmets. It will remain not what I posted.
But this is the joy of the internet- a fantastical echo box where people can drown out facts with opinion, ad hominem arguments, inferences, and glorious, vapid rhetoric.
On a side note- it wouldn't matter if a celebrity statistician or some random high school student crunched the numbers- the joy of statistics is the standardization of methodology and equalizing of stature.
Every now and then it does us good to exercise our “helmets and the law” debating skills. Sadly it seems that @eyebrows has left the discussion and is “no longer active” on lfgss.
Presumably he/she has gone back to MRCP revision. Nevertheless I will try to examine some of research links posted by @eyebrows (in separate postings here) in case he/she is looking.
There is a lot to learnt from examining helmet related questions further. I agree with the view of Prof. David Spiegelhalter and Dr. Ben Goldacre that such an examination provides a perfect teaching case for epidemiology. I think their BMJ article is essential reading for anyone seriously interested in the academic research.
http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/989799/1/bmj.f3817.full.pdf
Their short paper highlights what I think are a couple of fundamental truths:
and: