No need, RSF are aware of the thread-they can choose to confirm or deny your 'intentions' as they see fit. I think it's a matter of record that when first called out on it you didn't say you had a partnership with them or intended to do so, you just claimed it was a homage.
The thing with apologies though, Thom, is that people are entitled to accept them or not. The fact that he hasn't, seems to indicate he doesn't think it was sincere, and it's not because you said sorry that you're entitled to his forgiveness, especially if you go and repeat the same offence afterwards then lift the RSF logo to boot.
No need, RSF are aware of the thread-they can choose to confirm or deny your 'intentions' as they see fit. I think it's a matter of record that when first called out on it you didn't say you had a partnership with them or intended to do so, you just claimed it was a homage.
The thing with apologies though, Thom, is that people are entitled to accept them or not. The fact that he hasn't, seems to indicate he doesn't think it was sincere, and it's not because you said sorry that you're entitled to his forgiveness, especially if you go and repeat the same offence afterwards then lift the RSF logo to boot.