• Hmm, he's saying the high yaw experienced is transient though not that ave steady state yaw is high.

    Can you say what resolution you capture real world conditions at? Interesting why there might be a difference here or why you think it is wrong.

    I guess you can read that slowtwitch thread in two ways... Lol

  • Even so, their protocol still has too much emphasis on high yaw.

    We have various different bits of kit here, the Garmin Alphamantis system, NotioKonect etc and they all are running 100Hz and above (when needed). That data above some of it makes sense (ie matches up with the stuff we’ve found), but some of it - like the Flo data at 50kph - is so far out there that I can only see their protocol as source of the error, rather than the data collection itself. It’s hard though as everyone has their own methods so there’ll always be some discrepancy.

    Agreed on the Slowtwitch thread, it can be a bit mob mentality especially when their favourite people get criticised!

  • Princeton Carbon didn't get great review on Cycling Tips(I think) either. Their wheels seem like an expensive gamble.

About