You are reading a single comment by @Brommers and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
Brommers-
If it's so easy to win massive damages, why not sue? 🤔
(PS having read more about Gill v Anagnost, it's pretty amazing. Gill [as of May anyway] continued to post billboards whilst appealing the verdict. So presumably the damages continue to mount. The original damages would almost certainly be overturned at the appellate though, the calculations seem to be pretty arbitrary).
¡apesta!
I wasn't familiar with Gill v Anagnost, but it looks like there has been an explosion of high damages defamation cases in the last few years.
So do you think the Clintons will sue for defamation?