-
No. It was one they put in on the shared supply pipe to establish whether there was a leak. I assume it's in a publicly visible location.
This is down to No. 2 arguing that without proof of a leak you couldn't establish there was one. Which as No.1 apparently had a dug hole* constantly filling with water sounds a bit obtuse... but probably the correct thing to do.
*dug for an extension being built
FFS... long post incoming that I could do with some guidance on.
Tl;dr: there is a leak on shared supply pipe, but source is unknown.
Questions:
Facts:
My biggest concern is the leak being on our property, us being liable to fix, then being uninsured due to either; a) the insurers passing the buck between them, and/or b) not making them aware sooner.
The logical solution seems to be for No.s 1-5 to agree to get indy contractor in to source the leak then take it from there. Right?
It seems likely the leak is on No. 2 or us (No. 3). Based on; No. 1 being the victim of the leak (and having replaced all his pipework), No. 4 having an extension recently built (where builders claim to have inspected for leaks prior to work), No. 5 having recently sold and checked prior to sale.
Any help/advice much appreciated. Cheers!