You are reading a single comment by @cliveo and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • 3 points for a win isnt a good enough method of awarding value, ive come up with my own ratings. After the first round of matches the scores are as follows:

    Liverpool 8
    C Palace 7
    Spurs 7
    AFC Bournemouth 6
    Chelsea 6
    Man City 6
    Watford 6
    Leicester 5
    Man Utd 5
    Newcastle 5
    Wolves 5
    Arsenal 4
    Brighton 4
    Burnley 4
    Everton 4
    Fulham 4
    Cardiff 3
    Huddersfield 3
    Southampton 3
    West Ham 3

  • Wonderful. I really hope you keep this up all season.

    Tell me, why did Huddersfield only get the same points as West Ham?

    Why did West Ham get any points at all?

    Why aren’t Man City top after beating Arsenal?

    What is the basis for your allocation of points?

    Who do you support (please say Liverpool)?

    Are you older than 14?

  • Who do you support (please say Liverpool)?

    wonderful

  • Wonderful. I really hope you keep this up all season.
    Thats the plan but already effort is outweighing my enjoyment. Its just a bit of fun.

    Tell me, why did Huddersfield only get the same points as West Ham?
    Similar results against similar teams.

    Why did West Ham get any points at all?
    First week, let's be kind

    Why aren’t Man City top after beating Arsenal?
    For such a great team (Man City) it wasn't a remarkable result.

    What is the basis for your allocation of points?
    Gut feel. Plus what I pick up from the gutter press/twitter

    Who do you support (please say Liverpool)?
    Split loyalties, but Leicester and Bournemouth (and Reading but that's a whole different thing)
    You?

    Are you older than 14?
    Sadly, much much older.

About

Avatar for cliveo @cliveo started