I agree it's better as a spectacle to have a close race, but it never happens that way! And in a way that's a good thing.
Well, I don't mean, on a 4,000km race, people chasing each other along the same road only a couple of kilometres apart. In that type of race, 'close' means within a couple of dozen kilometres so that the lead can change again with a long rest, etc.
The chances of two or more riders being equally matched, with no drafting, after 7 or 8 days is very small.
And if they were close, the pressure to ride themselves into the ground to get an edge would keep building. So, as a rider, I'm kind of pleased that it's not close at the front now so that there isn't too much extra pressure on them. The later stages of these races are weird as a drug trip and highly emotional already!
I would worry about this if it were a professional sport, but then, as in boxing, there would probably be people in the athletes' 'corners' who would intervene in case there was evidence that someone couldn't continue. I'm not worried about that in amateurs.
I was thinking of just how tired both of the leaders where when they changed places . Plus whether this contributed to the end result . Like mister tom is now finding dealing with the fatigue and remaining level headed .
Well, I don't mean, on a 4,000km race, people chasing each other along the same road only a couple of kilometres apart. In that type of race, 'close' means within a couple of dozen kilometres so that the lead can change again with a long rest, etc.
I would worry about this if it were a professional sport, but then, as in boxing, there would probably be people in the athletes' 'corners' who would intervene in case there was evidence that someone couldn't continue. I'm not worried about that in amateurs.
@pacef8:
I'm not sure what you mean with the reference to Mike?