-
Do you say the same things about Wikileaks? I could be wrong but it was leaked as the AAF came under Cookson's watch and there were then internal moves at the UCI to change the salbutamol test levels which on the surface seemed like moving the goalposts. How do you stop concerned employees leaking?
The ASO seem to have been doing what they can to calm things, down to telling fans that they'll get three years in jail and a fine for fucking with the riders. You can't blame them for pushing for a decision pre-tour, and if Sky had communicated with them better about getting the results the week prior you can reasonably assume they wouldn't have publicly blocked Froome.
And how is Lapartient responsible for what Hinault says? The guy's not his employee, and he's retired. He can pretty much say whatever he likes with impunity, mores the pity.
Lots of fault with UCI processes but Brailsford turning it into Team GB vs the World isn't helping matters.
You are reading a single comment by @deleted and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
deleted
If the UCI cannot keep medical information confidential, why should he keep his thoughts confidential? He seems to have it in for the ASO and the UCI at the moment and rightly so. People are already booing Sky, what does he have to lose? If a fan does something silly, the ASO and UCI will get hammered. Are they going to blame his comments and walk away? I suspect DB is enjoying the shit out of this.