You are reading a single comment by @Jimmy_Fingers and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Every big name in cycling ever has some sort of doping related taint, yet for some reason they all ok but Froome isn't.

    I think history tends to be kinder to them eventually. Merckx was disliked during his time and was infamously punched by a spectator in the 1975 TdeF for instance.

    While Froome is winning everything and Sky are so dominant in the Grand Tours haters gonna hate. Not helped by Sky and Brailsford being so fucking awful at PR.

  • I think a rider's popularity plays a lot into how history judges. Indurain remains high on people's shit list for being an early adopter of EPO and time trialling to his TdF wins, Contador and Pantani are celebrated for their swashbuckling style, like Merckx.

    Sky and generally successful British riders, like the Americans before them, are seen an interlopers by a lot of traditional cycling fans, who only seem to like riders from traditional cycling countries, and riders from Southern Europe best of all.

  • Speaking of Mig, not-so big Dave B beat him in his Maratona dles Dolomites age group at the weekend.

    "He always had the engine, just needed to lose the weight" as someone remarked

About