You are reading a single comment by @gbj_tester and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Every big name in cycling ever has some sort of doping related taint, yet for some reason they all ok but Froome isn't
That's because they all actually doped, in a Faustian pact because winning without doping was, for them, impossible. Froome wins without doping, which just annoys people (especially journos) because there's no mythological narrative to pontificate about.
1 Attachment
-
gbj_tester
Tweeted by Susan Westemeyer. Hopefully taking cyclingnews with her.
The hand-wringing poor-me tweets over this TdF have been hilarious. So many 'I used to look forward to July but now it is ruined and so is the sport'.
Every big name in cycling ever has some sort of doping related taint, yet for some reason they all ok but Froome isn't.