-
• #10127
It was my initial thought but i couldn't find one in France so i went for the sisl2 as i got a great deal
-
• #10128
-
• #10129
Those cranks !
-
• #10130
^^I'd get those tyres (actually, the wheelset as a whole) into the bin, but otherwise that's awesome.
-
• #10131
I’m genuinely interested in the paint-joint issue. I suppose you refer to the clear coated frames? Are the red ones more likely to survive a few decades?
-
• #10132
Are the red ones more likely to survive a few decades?
Dunno. They are all well beyond their intended lifespan.
You just don’t see the same corrosion at the joins that you do on the clear coat frames.
-
• #10133
Has anyone experienced a persistent creak from the BB30a? I've tried numerous things to stop my bb from creaking but to no avail. It's getting to the point where I'm thinking Of seeling my CAAD12
-
• #10134
Bummer. Tried retaining compound? Assuming you have a version of the hollowgram crank have you checked the lock-ring?
-
• #10135
Yep, sounds very familiar. I got a wheels mfg adaption kit and stuck some different cranks on. That was 15months ago and it's been all good since.
-
• #10136
-
• #10137
New System Six with the usual complimentary wind tunnel testing
-
• #10138
They should have put the logo higher up the downtube.
Does look rapid though. Like a TT bike with drops. -
• #10139
Looks like an Aeroad.
-
• #10140
Just like every other road aero bike?
Wheels are apparently 32mm wide! But then they spec it with 23c Rubino Speeds which is questionable on all levels.
-
• #10141
Finding it hard to get excited about that.
-
• #10142
"Cannondale reckons that the aerodynamic performance of the SystemSix will benefit you in these ways:
• Riding solo or on the front of a group at 48km/h (30mph), the SystemSix will save you more than 50 watts compared to a lightweight (non-aero) road bike.
• Drafting behind another rider at 48km/h (30mph) saves you 30 watts compared to a lightweight road bike.
• At a speed of 30km/h (18.6mph) on a flat road a traditional road bike requires 140 watts while the SystemSix will save you around 10% power at that speed.
• In a 60km/h sprint over 200m, Cannondale’s notional rider on the SystemSix will save 0.4secs over an identical rider putting out the same power on a SuperSix Evo, finishing 7.2m ahead.
• Pedalling down a 5% gradient at 200 watts will get you to 60.6km/h on the SystemSix. According to Cannondale, you’d need to put out 309 watts on the SuperSix Evo in order to match that speed. That’s a huge difference.
• The SystemSix will save more than 50 watts over a traditional lightweight bike at 48km/h (30mph), 13 watts over Specialized’s Venge Vias 11 watts over the Cerverlo S5, and 6 watts over the Trek Madone, its nearest competitor.
As mentioned, these are all claims from Cannondale."
Unusual for a bike company to be so specific with their savings and competitor comparisons?
Obviously dependent on component choices etc.Points 3,4,5 are quite interesting, not so much Cannondale specific, but the benefits of aero bikes compared to standard.
-
• #10143
Maybe has to do something with SuperSix Evo being shit aero-wise :P
If all of this is truth I admire 2017 Cannondale-Drapac team riders even more.
-
• #10144
Aerobikes Are Dead
-
• #10146
Just needs a Saeco paint job and everyone will love it.
-
• #10147
You rang?
-
• #10148
looks shit. RIP in peace Cannondale
-
• #10150
13 watts over Specialized’s Venge Vias 11 watts over the Cerverlo S5, and 6 watts over the Trek Madone, its nearest competitor.
I thought the vias and the trek were supposed to be quite close aerodynamically? Surprised they claim the s5 is that close too
I'd try and track down some of the Slate SL arms as they were pretty much the exact same colour:
https://www.ridemedia.com.au/build-report/build-report-cannondale-slade-2016/