-
• #4402
-
• #4403
-
• #4404
Gravel anti?
-
• #4405
-
• #4406
-
• #4407
Nice for a Ribble
-
• #4408
Any recommendations for a fork for the Spesh Sequoia with large tyre clearance for 29er wheels?
I have the opportunity to get a Sequoia frame for cheap, and have a two wheelsets for my 29er mtb so am tempted by the idea to have two bikes I could swap the wheels between for different styles of bikepacking trips (one wheel has dynamo hub).
In an ideal world, it could take 29x2.4" tyres, 15mm Thru axle, 1 1/2" - 1 1/8" steerer, low rider rack mounts, and be carbon. I realise that's probably asking too much though.
-
• #4409
You'll ruin the geometry of your sequoia if you use a fork for 2.4" tyres.
-
• #4410
Why?
-
• #4411
By going from a factory 45mm (with at least 6mm clearance for ISO4210) to a 61mm tyre? Ruin?
-
• #4412
Yes, your tyre is on 2 sides of your wheel. So it lifts the front 32mm, which is a lot!
Also forks with that much clearance have a significant larger axle to crown length thus lifting your headtube even further.
-
• #4413
Because of the offset to compensate for the lack of suspension?
-
• #4414
Ok, thanks for your advice.
I do disagree a bit though, the axle is only lifted 16mm (one side of the tyre between axle and ground), the same happens to the rear so angles stay the same but BB, standover and CoG height are increased by 16mm.
Then the A to C will be slightly larger, about 16mm assuming clearance is kept the same, pushing the headtube up a bit and making the head angle marginally slacker.
-
• #4415
8mm no?
... assuming quite a round tyre profile.
-
• #4416
No idea where 52mm comes from.
-
• #4417
Because of the offset to compensate for the lack of suspension?
Not necessarily. But just making room for the a wheel and tyre that much bigger requires more A to C distance.
-
• #4418
You are right, my bad. Edited my earlier post.
No way a 29er 2.4" will fit in the back.
Good luck finding a 411mm AC fork, I couldn't find one.
-
• #4419
Sell Sequoia and get an AWOL.
-
• #4420
The problem is you'll need to move your saddle further forward, a longer stem, wider bar for the much slower handling on the road (probably OK off road), and drop bar with near MTB front end is not as easy to ride as a traditional flat bar.
TL:DR; get a AWOL.
-
• #4421
If you really want big tyres, get a 650b wheelset and 2.1 tyres instead which will fit, also this allow it to handle equally well as a 700c with 42mm tyres and also kept the weight down.
-
• #4422
I couldn't get more than 2.2" in my AWOL.
-
• #4423
Hah, in that case, stick to Sequoia and put 2.1 tyres, it's still a massive tyres regardless.
-
• #4424
Wow, that fork takes 2.1"? Quite amazed by that.
-
• #4425
But to be quite honest, if you want 2.4 tyres, then maybe a rigid MTB would be a much better choice, or those bike like the Genesis Vagabond.
The answer is usually just ‘overshoes’ though isn’t it?