Analog film photography and cameras

Posted on
Page
of 967
  • 4 1/2 years old, this was a very interesting NYE. I think I pushed the film a few stops. Can’t remember much, certainly not what camera. Probably a mju or similar, maybe a Contax T2, or GR. Really not sure.


    1 Attachment

    • 200E96B4-A5B2-4BB2-89B7-FE5C6B8AB7F4.jpeg
  • Also have one, hated it first 2 rolls, loved it ever since... paid 160 quid for mine.

  • Jonwayne! Where did you see him? I saw him in Camden last year and he was absolutely fantastic.

  • Tmax 400 pushed to 1600. This was my first time pushing film and I have to say, I'm not very disappointed.

  • Yes. It was in Paris last year. Great show indeed. Sorry for this little black frame, it is to easily cut it after print.

  • Haven't shot Tri-X pushed to 1600 in 35mm thinking it would be a bit of mess, but it's actually really nice when you get the exposure right. Underexposed shots look horrible however. Is it worth slightly over-exposing pushed Tri-X to avoid under-exposure ? If that makes sense...

    Anyhoo, some of the shots I'm happy with


    3 Attachments

    • 10810013 (1).jpg
    • 10810037 (1).jpg
    • 10810008 (1).jpg
  • Nice, 1 and 3 are great.

  • Rolleicord VB / Ektar 100


    3 Attachments

    • LRM_EXPORT_20180614_233109.jpg
    • LRM_EXPORT_20180614_233024.jpg
    • LRM_EXPORT_20180614_232935.jpg
  • Cheers, means a lot as you post a lot of nice stuff on here

  • T-Max up there is so good. Nice page. So I'm gonna go and ruin it.


    4 Attachments

    • CNV00003.jpg
    • CNV00030.jpg
    • CNV00032.jpg
    • CNV00035.jpg
  • Nowt wrong with these!

  • Heh, I know. Just not as nice as I remember thinking they'd be at the time of shooting :-P

  • Thoughts on Ultramax 400 ? Now that Superia 400 is getting more pricey and may not be long for this world I thought I'd give Ultramax a go. I like it, not sure I like it more than Superia though


    4 Attachments

    • 10800032.jpg
    • 10790009.jpg
    • 10800014.jpg
    • 10790029-2.jpg
  • I think for some occasions it's pretty great, it's looking sort-of "warm, but fresh" if that makes sense.

    Maybe not the top choice for green-ish landscapes though. Fuji is king of the green hues.

  • MJU II or F6 / Kodak Gold 200


    3 Attachments

    • 000044740010.jpg
    • 000044760034.jpg
    • 000044770014.jpg
  • That ferry shot is ace

  • I think for some occasions it's pretty great, it's looking sort-of "warm, but fresh" if that makes sense.

    Maybe not the top choice for green-ish landscapes though. Fuji is king of the green hues.

    Kodak seems to be quite neutral with greens in general. Shot a few rolls of Ektar down the local wood and it also seems to be neutral with green which is kind of disappointing. It's still a lovely film though* - level of detail on a neg scan is pretty amazing, even with backlit scenes.

    *Although having to honk around a tripod to shoot at f8/11 in daylight because 100ISO is a pain in the arse


    4 Attachments

    • 10780007.jpg
    • 10780014.jpg
    • 10780028.jpg
    • 10780030.jpg
  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Analog film photography and cameras

Posted by Avatar for GA2G @GA2G

Actions