In the news

You are reading a single comment by @NotThamesWater and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

Charlie_L

Not employed but still a worker

decided that Mr Smith had not been an employee under a contract of employment, and therefore that he was not entitled to complain of unfair dismissal

but he can complain about deductions from his wages, lack of holiday pay and discrimination against disabled person because

Mr Smith qualified as a ‘worker’ under s.230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (and by analogy the relevant provisions of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and the Equality Act 2010),

•

NotThamesWater in reply to @Charlie_L

Not employed

Want that part of the original tribunal's finding, but the only part that want challenged?

I first read it as being the Supreme Court's ruling, and thought it basically meant that unfair dismissal was dead as a concept now.

About

Avatar for NotThamesWater @NotThamesWater started