-
This bit doesn’t add up to me
You're quickly down the rabbit hole if you expect any of the speculation about Froome's (or anybody else's) physiology to add up. In pretty much every case, people cobble together individual estimates with population level statistics and then try to prove that he's doping by using information with 10% error bars to come to conclusions with a claimed accuracy of under 1%
This bit doesn’t add up to me, it seems like clever switching of focus. Whilst each fact may be correct in itself they pose no relevance to each other.