-
I didn’t know for some reason, hadn’t bothered checking so assumed better. And it is very disappointing.
Aside from the public confession, and the fact she rode for TVM, who by all accounts were juiced like lab rats, both public record... yet you care so much now, after years of reading her articles and presumably finding them of merit until the day she dared broach the subject of the credibility of Froome's ride on stage 19 and concluded with a "I genuinely don't know"?
I think a lot of people who respond this way would be theologians in another era, mumbling catchetisms whilst deliberating on the merit of rounding up disbelievers and burning them lest God be angry and give everyone the pox.
deleted-
Taking it to the next level now, I'm happy I knew when to stop :)
-
catchetisms
Catch E.T.-isms? :)
He's not the messiah, just a very naughty alien.
-
Calm your tits, I hadn't realised expressing disappointment in finding out she cheated would be so insulting to you.
I don't claim to know everything about every rider and every team, I have read some of her articles until I decided to try to avoid CN like the plague. I am fairly consistent with my regard for ex-dopers: Landis, Virenque, Millar and Armstrong etc and I generally don't like them getting too much exposure in the cycling press, sorry about that.
scorch
Oliver Schick
Jimmy_Fingers
I didn’t know for some reason, hadn’t bothered checking so assumed better. And it is very disappointing.
As far as validation is concerned, she can have her opinion and CN can give her a platform, but like Landis I’m not sure I’m interested. A lot of ex-dopers operate on the ‘we had to dope to race’ and so apply that to modern riders.