Cyclingnews reporting it to sound like there was some conspiracy going on...
Cyclingnews have an agenda, and they're not subtle about pushing it. Basically, they don't like Sky and will take any opportunity to cast aspersions and spread innuendo about the team and anyone involved in it. Not sure why, but they don't really make much of an effort to hide it.
in what sense? Bottom line was an emphatic "I have no idea" if Froome is doping or not going on what she saw of the race and her opinion of the tactics etc. Unless just by discussing it and refusing to rule it out she's making an accusation?
Cyclingnews have an agenda, and they're not subtle about pushing it. Basically, they don't like Sky and will take any opportunity to cast aspersions and spread innuendo about the team and anyone involved in it. Not sure why, but they don't really make much of an effort to hide it.