You are reading a single comment by @Jimmy_Fingers and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Because it would stop some of the pretty mindless hysteria around Froome's win

    I actually doubt that. I mean, if this were about the facts everyone would wait for due process to be followed before they condemned.

  • I think the hysteria is here to stay around Froome, whatever he was to do, but there are things he can do to at least reduce the number of sticks social media and the press are using to hit him with at least.

    Renewed talk of ASO preventing him ride the tour (and the legal quagmire that will end up being), and doubt cast on the AAF being resolved by then from Lappartient. A proper clusterfuck.

  • Or social media and the press could wait until the outcome and then comment once all the facts are laid out?

  • All caused by an improper leak. Notwithstanding the background I can understand sky / froome being reluctant to dance to the tune of people who show no desire to be objective.

About