You are reading a single comment by @hippy and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Yeah but Lance already had a lot of whistleblowers that he was actively suppressing, towards the later years his doping was an open secret, just needed to be proved. With Froome you have a AAF for sabultamol and an iffy transformation in 2011.

    No ex-soigneurs, ex-teammates and wives of ex-teammates lining up to say he is a doper. Not yet anyway.

  • whistleblowers that he was actively suppressing

    They're either whistleblowers or they're not.

    In the earlier days the French press, the blokes over here all ripped him to pieces before he'd tested positive (and covered it up). The French without fail would get leaked test info from most of the riders back in the day and there'd be a story before the rider knew. So, his hypocrisy examples are poor.

About

Avatar for hippy @hippy started