shall accord such precedence to any such pedestrian
Which pretty much backs up what stevo_com wrote.
Whenever a pedestrian is on the crossing*, they have priority.
Not the right to sole occupation.
There's nothing about finishing crossing, nor stopping even.
I love a pedantic quibble, me.
* providing no part of a vehicle was already on the crossing.
It depends what "Accord precedence" means in laymans terms, and I prefer the idea that peds have sole occupation rather than having to rely on dangerous/careless driving laws!
Quite, makes the forum world go round!
@Backstop started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
Which pretty much backs up what stevo_com wrote.
Whenever a pedestrian is on the crossing*, they have priority.
Not the right to sole occupation.
There's nothing about finishing crossing, nor stopping even.
I love a pedantic quibble, me.
* providing no part of a vehicle was already on the crossing.