• shall accord such precedence to any such pedestrian

    Which pretty much backs up what stevo_com wrote.

    Whenever a pedestrian is on the crossing*, they have priority.

    Not the right to sole occupation.

    There's nothing about finishing crossing, nor stopping even.

    I love a pedantic quibble, me.

    * providing no part of a vehicle was already on the crossing.

  • Not the right to sole occupation.

    It depends what "Accord precedence" means in laymans terms, and I prefer the idea that peds have sole occupation rather than having to rely on dangerous/careless driving laws!

    I love a pedantic quibble, me.

    Quite, makes the forum world go round!

About

Avatar for Backstop @Backstop started