-
IME If you look at the first shot, same shot, shot well on a good film (given the day a sharp ektar 100 although portra 160 is my fav now) would have more data/details in both dark and light where as with digital even with manipulated "HDR" there won't be. The more details/data you have the more you can interpret it if you need to.
amey-
ha....hahahah....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!
Just because you're throwing 'data' in there, doesn't mean what you're saying is right dude.
People hype the 'magic' of film too much. Back in yonder days Porta was considered as throw away as any other.
Bad exposure is the same on film or digital. Bad exposure. Film will not do it better, it's the meat bag behind the viewfinder that does the work.
Under the enlarger is where the 'magic' happens. Even the masters spent days on a single shot pushing and pulling.
Chak
Yes, but what is it based on. I'm genuinely interested. My phone always does HDR by default and I didn't know there could be a downside to it?