• I find the dropper more curious. If you're riding that steep a terrain, surely you're better off with an XC bike no? Also 140mm rotors on a 'fast' bike?

  • There was a GCN video about using them on descents. It's gotta be safer than sitting on the top tube... But I don't see why you'd want that on a gravel bike, it's only full-blown roadies going down Alpine passes at 100 km/h who'd need them, not people riding gravel bikes.

    The only situation I can think of where this makes sense is if you're riding a really long route which is 90% road and 10% downhill/dirt jump or something weird like that? i.e. you need close-to-MTB capability for short bits of a ride but are mostly crusing on tarmac at road bike speeds where an MTB would be too slow.

  • 10% downhill/dirt jump

    Eh?
    So...cruising at road bike speeds on knobblies and suspension..
    But then you want to do a couple of table tops at Fort Williams?

    @PhilDAS I'm all for both, but the lines are getting a bit blurry now. A light, fast, XC bike will be far more capable than this. This just seems like an a bike by numbers. Hey we haz the tech...we can build madness!

    Saying that....would totally have a go!

  • Some CX racers swear by dropper posts. They run 1x and rig up the left brifter to dropper post. TrainerRoad how-to here
    Doesn't quite invalidate the 'just get a MTB argument' but there's proper precedent for droppers on dropbars at least.

About

Avatar for frankenbike @frankenbike started