You are reading a single comment by @tbc and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I meant once it's been proven.
The very fact that UKAD and WADA are being mentioned in relation to amateur racing shows how pathetic it is.
But I agree, until you can prove someone has cheated, the ridicule is a little unfair.
tbc-
UKAD test amateur racing which is good because they've busted people like the Nat 12hr winner a few years ago. I've been tested* after the Welsh 50 Champs, presumably as they focus their testing on top finishers.
*120 proof :)
-
Any cheating is pathetic. At any level. Doesn’t make it any less wrong. I work my arse off, just as much as any pro. To not be able to win because someone cheated is shit.
hippy
skinny
Problem is ridicule isn’t based on fact but hearsay.
No matter how dubious someone’s performance, you can’t really judge them without proof.
But yes, as the secret pro would say, anyone that is suspected of doping will be talking about and ridden into the gutter.