-
• #6727
If the EXIF is absent
When one uploads an image as an attachement here it gets stripped of its EXIF
-
• #6728
How do I check this? Could I add it manually?
Open the file with an image editing program, that should allow you to read the EXIF if present. There are many programs which allow you to edit EXIF
-
• #6729
When one uploads an image as an attachement here it gets stripped of its EXIF
Not true.
When one downloads or views an image on this site the image is optimised for delivery and then the EXIF is stripped.
But the upload is intact. During upload we rotate if necessary and then put it in Amazon S3, and on download it runs through Cloudflare Polish and EXIF is removed, and if you are using a .webp compatible browser it's converted to .webp.
We optimise the download, not the upload.
-
• #6730
Edit: the screen captures show how lfgss reoriented the 'potrait' pic from main camera app. Vignette pics missing this info then?
Spot on.
Your camera and phone is good, the EXIF correctly allows the site to rotate. The Vignette app not so good, it's removing or corrupting the FlipDirection part of the EXIF.
-
• #6731
Thank you for the background info, interesting.
I personally would prefer if the file kept it's EXIF data (thus keeping copyright and IPTC info) though to be honest.
-
• #6732
That kinda ruined the Bike Tag game though.
-
• #6733
I didn't know you and done that. I have been turning off location in the camera app when taking tag pictures!
-
• #6734
Haha, ok, fair enough..
-
• #6735
the thing which makes it happen is uploading images to cloud storage and having your operating system provider's AI look at them
Pretty sure I only store locally... odd.
-
• #6736
Ta.
-
• #6737
Understood, ta.
-
• #6738
Is there a way to pull the exif info? Would make bike tag a lot easier.
-
• #6739
Pretty sure I only store locally...
Your phone OS spies on you even if you don't use the cloud storage explicitly. You don't need to have full resolution images uploaded to their server, AFAIK the AI which categorises image content works better with less detail so thumbnails will do.
-
• #6740
Hmmmm... looks like it needs some development still as all my duckface pouting selfies have been categorised as 'Knob'.
-
• #6741
When did phones start auto-putting categories against pictures?
2015 for Android https://splinternews.com/the-new-google-photos-app-is-disturbingly-good-at-data-1793848125
-
• #6742
That kinda ruined the Bike Tag game though.
Stripping it completely ruines copyright though.
Is there a way to strip all but this?
I realise this is not a photo forum, but still.. would be very nice. -
• #6743
There are no options to partially keep EXIF. It's all or nothing. A lot is to do with the fact that EXIF whilst being mostly standard isn't actually consistent, different programs create different things and it can be a bit unstructured. It's much the same as Id3 tags on MP3 files, more a convention than a strictly adhered to standard. And on the "optimise for delivery" path, mucking around trying to determine exactly what the program that last modified the EXIF intended isn't anyone's priority... it just gets stripped.
-
• #6744
Stripping it completely ruines copyright though
EXIF sometimes tells you who claims copyright. It doesn't have any bearing on who actually owns the copyright.
-
• #6745
Could you keep just the IPTC ?
-
• #6746
I'm not the one stripping the EXIF, and the options of the program are essentially: "remove all metadata and compress for delivery over the wire" or "do nothing".
I do enjoy a bandwidth bill, and so we will continue to optimise for fewest bytes over the wire.
In my tests on the more extreme end, a 30 MB image can be reduced to 17 MB. But that only happens when all metadata is stripped, and a webp is used instead of a jpeg. When a single image can be reduced by almost half... then we are always going to do this.
The options I have:
- Strip metadata
- Strip metadata and compress
- Strip metadata and compress and use webp where it is safe to
There is no option that preserves metadata and yet compresses.
- Strip metadata
-
• #6747
I see!
Thank you for making that clear!
-
• #6748
Is there a reason why I can see embedded images in this post via mobile (chrome) but not via laptop (firefox)
-
• #6749
I've unticked the box to stop getting email notifications about items I'm watching but am still getting emails. Anyway to stop this but still get notified if I'm replied to directly?
-
• #6750
Is there a reason why I can see embedded images in this post via mobile (chrome) but not via laptop (firefox)
Do you have any extensions/add ons installed on your laptop running Firefox that might prevent the images from showing? Ad blockers, privacy extensions/add ons, that sort of thing. If so, try disabling (these) extensions/add ons and see if that does anything.
Android thread will tell you when it started on your phone, but the thing which makes it happen is uploading images to cloud storage and having your operating system provider's AI look at them and try to guess what they are pictures of.