-
Threaded BB, so no creaking.
30mm BB, so you can use cranks with a 30mm spindle.
Narrower than 386EVO so you can use normal BB30/PF30 cranks, not just BSA30/386EVO compatible cranks.The same can be said for BSA *. But everyone makes BSA compatible BBs. And tooling.
*Unless you want to use a proper BB30 crank.
-
But you can't use a proper BB30 crank in T47 either, right?
Yes, you can. The spacing on a T47 BB is the same as a true BB30 BB system*. That's what I was referring to by 'normal BB30/PF30 cranks' as opposed to BSA30/386EVO cranks which will fit in external bearings fitted in a BSA BB shell, unlike 'normal' BB30 cranks. For example, the S-Works carbon cranks will fit in a T47 BB, but won't fit in a Rotor BSA30 or FSA 386EVO BB.
* At least I hope it is. Otherwise that $300+ plus duty I spent on some T47 taps and T47 BB shells was a total fucking waste of money**.
** Ye Gods but I hate Markup. Why should using asterisks be so smegging hard?
As ever, there's pros and cons.
Pros:
Cons:
Ultimately it depends what cranks you want to fit. If you're going to fit 24mm spindle cranks, or 30mm spindle cranks which will fit a 386EVO/BSA30 bottom bracket then it's not really worth it unless you are absolutely obsessed with future-proofing and want to ensure that you can fit every single type of hollow spindle crank - i.e. not square taper, ISIS or anything similar. Or cotterless cranks if you're really odd.
Basically, if it's a bespoke bike, chose your cranks, and then spec the BB to suit.