Aren't they absolutely massive though?
That depends if you think that 41mm or 45mm is massive or not. Not for me.
My colleague has a 45mm and he's a big lad with big wrists but I didn't feel that it was oversized on my considerably skinnier wrists.
45mm is ridiculous (imo) but i didn't realise they did a 41mm version. What are the compromises? Taller watch? Less battery life etc?
I guess i could just fucking google it... :)
To answer my own question, the 41mm is .55mm thinner, has a smaller battery but the same runtime (allegedly...), double the internal memory, and only a slightly worse pixel count (390x390 vs 400x400) which means a higher ppi.
Impressive...
@Stonehedge started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
Aren't they absolutely massive though?