I think they're already better than most humans at what most driving should involve, and that's without a lot of the interconnectedness which would easily make them vastly superior. Processing what humans see in a way humans do might well be some way off, but processing what they can sense in a way to make them safer and better at most normal driving situations isn't. Just not being drunk, high, angry, distracted, old, bored, only able to look in one direction, makes them better than a lot of people. I'm sure you're a wonderful driver, computers being good too doesn't take that away from you. I've taught enough people to drive to know which I'd prefer though.
I think they're already better than most humans at what most driving should involve, and that's without a lot of the interconnectedness which would easily make them vastly superior. Processing what humans see in a way humans do might well be some way off, but processing what they can sense in a way to make them safer and better at most normal driving situations isn't. Just not being drunk, high, angry, distracted, old, bored, only able to look in one direction, makes them better than a lot of people. I'm sure you're a wonderful driver, computers being good too doesn't take that away from you. I've taught enough people to drive to know which I'd prefer though.