You are reading a single comment by @miro_o and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Isn’t that the problem though, Corbyn (but mainly his advisors) have chosen to score cheap political points rather than condemn it. We don’t know who in Russia authorised this act, but it’s clear that the substance used was produced by the Russian authorities.

  • it’s clear that the substance used was produced by the Russian authorities.

    It’s clear it looks like it was made in Moscow (is the public line I believe). The CIA could do that. #tinfoilhat

    Seriously though, I don’t understand who in Russia benefits from this attack.

    Perhaps May should have spoken relatively softly, avoided accusation of state involvement without more evidence ..... and kicked all known fsb agents out anyway.

  • Elections in Russia are coming up, could be a way to score points by appearing strong on foreign policy, going after traitors etc. One of the public news readers in Russia made some thinly veiled threats to traitors when the attack first hit the news. Could be some political motivation behind it, either Russia sending a signal or someone else trying to get Russia blamed. Why else use an agent that can be identified as produced by Russia and is likely only accessible to a small group of people?

    Maybe Corbyn is not very vocal because in this situation there is not much he can do to attack the Government. He cannot call for a softer response because he would look weak on Russia and he cannot call for a stronger response because there is not much more the UK can do without more evidence, official backing from international institutions etc.

    I always thought that expelling a small
    number diplomats is an easy thing for Governments to do that looks good in the press but has no big effect.

  • Seriously though, I don’t understand who in Russia benefits from this attack.

    The whole system as it currently stands.

    Obviously we can only guess at the exact reasons. But on a very general level, ruthless violence against enemies of the state is a pretty standard method of coercion.

    I really don't see what is hard to understand here. Just have a read of accounts, or talk people who've worked out there. It's a bit like Ken's bit on RT from the other page, "Putin isn't sitting in his office plotting who to kill" (paraphrasing). Of course he doesn't literally spend his time in an evil genius cave plotting the downfall of the West. However, NATO and the EU represent a direct challenge to him by existing as powerful blocs and as such they will be undermined where possible. Equally any opposition whether it be Ologarchs, Hermitige Capital, or reporters will ultimately get there comeuppance.

About

Avatar for miro_o @miro_o started