Imo, if accurate, it seems like a pretty odd stance to take. Surely this is basic stuff; (1) thoughts and prayers / shocked and appalled, (2) waiting for all the information, (3) swift response once we have the answers.
Happy to be corrected, but don't most pundits hold the view that Putin has successfully used a mix of paramilitaries, mafia, and FSB to carry out attacks? Seems so odd to already be putting out excuses which spread doubt and aren't necessarily separate from the state.
Im not thinking about the info put out by labour or the government, more the info/analysis they are privi to. Its not inconceivable that the government knows who did what and why and how it is or is not linked to putin.
My info is from this account of what his press secretary said; http://www.entornointeligente.com/articulo/4005893/INGLES-Corbyn-challenges-Mays-evidence-of-Russian-lsquo;culpabilityrsquo;-in-exspy-poisoning-14032018
... because I struggled to find anything more detailed or showing the og text. If anyone has anything better I'd appreciate it.
Imo, if accurate, it seems like a pretty odd stance to take. Surely this is basic stuff; (1) thoughts and prayers / shocked and appalled, (2) waiting for all the information, (3) swift response once we have the answers.
Happy to be corrected, but don't most pundits hold the view that Putin has successfully used a mix of paramilitaries, mafia, and FSB to carry out attacks? Seems so odd to already be putting out excuses which spread doubt and aren't necessarily separate from the state.