Isn’t that the problem though, Corbyn (but mainly his advisors) have chosen to score cheap political points rather than condemn it. We don’t know who in Russia authorised this act, but it’s clear that the substance used was produced by the Russian authorities.
That's not how I've read it. So maybe (probably) that's my bias! However, I've seen calls for unequivocal condemnation (of Russia rather than the attack) which, despite me suspecting them being directed to the right source, I'd be hesitant to give.
Isn’t that the problem though, Corbyn (but mainly his advisors) have chosen to score cheap political points rather than condemn it. We don’t know who in Russia authorised this act, but it’s clear that the substance used was produced by the Russian authorities.