You are reading a single comment by @deleted and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Depends on whether you hold Brailsford and Wiggins to their 'no needles', totally transparent schtick or not.
As an individual event, I'd agree it's circumstantial, but each instance and contradiction progressively creates a persuasive narrative where they're saying one thing and doing another.
Cope wasn't even in the same country according to Brailsford... something you'd think he'd check before replying to quite a major allegation of doping.
deleted
GoatandTricycle
Because as the writer also says context is everything that using something like it not being discussed is beyond even circumstantial evidence.