You are reading a single comment by @GoatandTricycle and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Because as the writer also says context is everything that using something like it not being discussed is beyond even circumstantial evidence.
GoatandTricycle-
Depends on whether you hold Brailsford and Wiggins to their 'no needles', totally transparent schtick or not.
As an individual event, I'd agree it's circumstantial, but each instance and contradiction progressively creates a persuasive narrative where they're saying one thing and doing another.
Cope wasn't even in the same country according to Brailsford... something you'd think he'd check before replying to quite a major allegation of doping.
deleted
It's a pretty major contradiction in approaches to their athletes-why openly talk about Uran's need for a TUE but hide Wiggins'?
He himself says that the day the jiffy bag was delivered there's inconsistencies about when the bus was supposed to have left that retrospectively don't sit well.