Agree Li is nasty. But the human body is only about 25% efficient so much worse than power banks.
Time spent making fiddly parts still has a carbon footprint: if it's people doing work, they need to eat and consume other stuff which all has a cost.
The only bit of the cost of the dynamo which doesn't have environmental cost is the IPR or value in its patents.
The challenge with a lot of green technologies is to get them to the point that they use less energy in their manufacture than they save in their usable life. A bike dynamo has its advantages but it's far from obvious it passes that test!
The people making them would probably eat anyway, about the same amount. But indeed manufacturing anything takes energy and resources and usually creates waste.
Agree Li is nasty. But the human body is only about 25% efficient so much worse than power banks.
Time spent making fiddly parts still has a carbon footprint: if it's people doing work, they need to eat and consume other stuff which all has a cost.
The only bit of the cost of the dynamo which doesn't have environmental cost is the IPR or value in its patents.
The challenge with a lot of green technologies is to get them to the point that they use less energy in their manufacture than they save in their usable life. A bike dynamo has its advantages but it's far from obvious it passes that test!