You are reading a single comment by @Fox and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I have to say I'm disappointed by the 'no rules broken' and 'ethical grey area' responses in this thread. To me this isn't just about cheating in sport, which frankly I don't think can be adequately policed, but more general ethical behaviour in organisations, especially those receiving public money.
+1
Fox
Not just a lack of support, but misappropriation of resources, plus with the skinsuits, a commercial benefit to Sky on the back of implied sponsorship, where there was apparently none.
Oh, and another more doping-related example: BC and Sky sharing pharmaceutical stock with no adequate records to tie to individuals, either by accident or design. I guess that didn't break any rules, but it obfuscated who was taking what, and was one effect of inadequate controls on conflict of interest.
I have to say I'm disappointed by the 'no rules broken' and 'ethical grey area' responses in this thread. To me this isn't just about cheating in sport, which frankly I don't think can be adequately policed, but more general ethical behaviour in organisations, especially those receiving public money.