Pretty sure faking medical need to get a certificate of exemption for a substance known to provide sporting advantage is sub par behaviour, even if the rules don't appear to be broken.
All the people saying 'no rules broken' would then be stating that if Lance had a proper, pre-dated TUE for his steroid bust in 1999 instead of a post-dated one (which is just as fake as anything Sky has procured by all accounts) that would be acceptable regardless of the fact we now know it was part of a wider doping strategy?
Pretty sure faking medical need to get a certificate of exemption for a substance known to provide sporting advantage is sub par behaviour, even if the rules don't appear to be broken.
All the people saying 'no rules broken' would then be stating that if Lance had a proper, pre-dated TUE for his steroid bust in 1999 instead of a post-dated one (which is just as fake as anything Sky has procured by all accounts) that would be acceptable regardless of the fact we now know it was part of a wider doping strategy?