You are reading a single comment by @tbc and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I've no problem whatsoever with parliamentary scrutiny of taxpayers' money, which essentially what this boils down to.

    But to use 'an anonymous but well respected' source as the main source of your accusations doesn't sit well with me, then to make the headline that Sky crossed an ethical line, which doesn't exist, is fundamentally wrong. They either broke the rules of the sport or they didn't, and all the available evidence says they didn't, so there is no case to answer.

  • Do you think the sport could become more transparent and ethical as a result?

  • I doubt it. I don’t care really either, the WADA code is for all sports to follow, as long as cycling remains signed up to that then that’s good enough for me.

About

Avatar for tbc @tbc started