-
I've no problem whatsoever with parliamentary scrutiny of taxpayers' money, which essentially what this boils down to.
But to use 'an anonymous but well respected' source as the main source of your accusations doesn't sit well with me, then to make the headline that Sky crossed an ethical line, which doesn't exist, is fundamentally wrong. They either broke the rules of the sport or they didn't, and all the available evidence says they didn't, so there is no case to answer.
You're right in a way, but the DCMS Select Committee are not:
1) Permanently engaged with doing nothing but looking at cheating in sport
2) Members of the government
3) More than 1.7% of all MPs
Saying they have more important things to deal with is like telling a PCSO who tells you off for dropping litter that they should be off shutting down paedophile rings.