This could either be a bit of a torpedo for the reputation of professional cycling (and by extension, cycling in general) or it could just shift the boundaries of what 'credible' cycling constitutes even more. That wouldn't really be a bad thing.
The Guardian are suggesting it is a 'death knell' for Team Sky. I'm not sure it will be, because Froome case notwithstanding, the 'unethical but within the rules' still does sound a bit flimsy to lose sponsorship.
This could either be a bit of a torpedo for the reputation of professional cycling (and by extension, cycling in general) or it could just shift the boundaries of what 'credible' cycling constitutes even more. That wouldn't really be a bad thing.
The Guardian are suggesting it is a 'death knell' for Team Sky. I'm not sure it will be, because Froome case notwithstanding, the 'unethical but within the rules' still does sound a bit flimsy to lose sponsorship.