You are reading a single comment by @rhb and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • This is interesting, isn't it? On the one hand, the rider (who isn't using the 'cycle path'/the sub-divided footway) is accused of being selfish. But why would he/she be selfish unless the commenter on that image recognised that the carriageway offered superior riding here? (NB I'm not saying it does, just trying to unpick the logic.) And if it does, isn't the commenter likewise selfish for wanting the rider to ride in worse conditions?

  • Of course, you can see it like that. I was just interested in the unintentional revelation in the comments on the picture.

About

Avatar for rhb @rhb started