In the news

You are reading a single comment by @ and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

h2o in reply to @mashton

If you read the actual story instead of just the tweet, you’ll see that the NYT is including money spent on their behalf by PACs since 1989, whereas the chart is just donations since 1998. Details matter.

•

in reply to @h2o

If you read the actual story instead of just the tweet... Details matter.

Says the guys who posted a link to an image and then followed it up with "Look at the chart".

•

h2o in reply to @

The headline and axes are clearly labelled, as is the source. The NY Times article also provides the basis of its sums. The metrics are clearly somewhat different.

About

@ started