-
• #118352
As tester says, but from googling it seems that the required post is more like 26.8.
-
• #118353
I wanted one in similar design to the one posted and I can’t find one in 27.0. The work would only cost me a beer as A customer of mine runs a metal spinning company. But I think I might just buy a diffrent one in the correct size and save the potential risk.
-
• #118354
Yeah think I might just buy new. I’ve used my works gauge to measure the current one and that shows 27.0 but it’s a bit old so I’ll take a new measurement with my gauges and see what it shows back. I did read it was 26.8 online also to be fair.
-
• #118355
I wanted one in similar design to the one posted
Then you are beyond help 🙂
-
• #118356
this is awesome!
-
• #118357
Thank you! To be honest, most of the parts on there have been poorly thought out. I'm surprised it just about hangs together, aesthetically. Logically it's a mess.
Frame - 2002 (has a the Look URL on the chainstay)
Fork - mismatched, shunting the bike back in time from its original a-head stem to a quill
Wheels - about 1995
Groupset - late 80s
Saddle - a bit hipstery
Chainrings - modern SRAM 10-speed ones
Seatpost - subject to a recall over a decade ago
Headset - fugly and full of mismatched parts
Stem - thought it had grown on me but nah -
• #118358
Stem - thought it had grown on me but nah
The quill bolt cover is trying to get away, maybe the feeling is mutual.
-
• #118359
Poor quality photo but this thing is awesoms.
1 Attachment
-
• #118360
Ha - got a new one cover (two, actually) sitting on a shelf.
-
• #118361
No your advice has been helpful thanks.
-
• #118362
Indeed I really like the Romanesque churches of the 12th century
-
• #118363
new Tie and solder...
-
• #118364
I think the sheriff stars could look really cool with a starfish crankset, the shape of the star is somewhat similar.
-
• #118365
A total mish mash of bits from the parts bin but I finally got this built up after the frame and forks were sat in the shed for ages. There's loads I'd change if I had the money (primarily the boat anhcor rear wheel) but it's really good fun to ride. Enjoying the wideish bars as well! Sorry for the truly awful photos.
1 Attachment
-
• #118366
-
1 Attachment
-
• #118367
A friend of mine has got the same/similar frame in grey. Really love it from the looks, but it's one of the most noodly frames i know (as far as i can tell by testing the headset). Maybe the updated fork improves a little bit on this...
-
• #118368
Got my Van Nicholas Boreas finished yesterday
-
• #118369
Interesting, and I'm not surprised. What do you mean by testing the headset?
-
• #118370
Looks great!
-
• #118371
Cheers pretty happy with it, those challenge tyres aren't half a battle to fit though!
It weighs 7.7kg which I think is pretty decent considering it wasn't built up with weight a priority
-
• #118372
I guess it's when you wrap your hand around the headset, turn the bars to the side, apply the front brake and rock the bike backwards and forwards: if there's play in your headset, you'll be able to feel it.
Can't say I've ever used it to assess the noodle factor.
-
• #118373
That van Nicholas looks great.
DA 9000 looks better than 9100 to me. -
• #118374
Odd that they'd measure the extension of the stem and not the reach. Who needs to know extension?
-
• #118375
@fizzy.bleach Exactly what i mean...i normally also don't test the noodle factor with this approach, however in this case it was pretty obvious. But i don't want to spoil the party - maybe the frame is a little bit older and used a different carbon composit. Cannot find any pictures online - looks the same, but colour is a nice dull grey.
Get a chain guide, it won't have anything to do with the chain or cx1