-
• #54001
-
• #54003
That's from the T5 GB press shots which has a very normal sized ring.
-
• #54004
what size cogs are they running?
-
• #54005
15 and 16t would make sense. Certainly not 64/14.
But this isn't very hip hop.
-
• #54006
The difference is small, but measurable: which isn't to say anyone would notice the difference while riding.
A chain is comprised of a series of straight sections (ie the links), when wrapped around large sprockets this is less apparent and friction is reduced.
At least that's my understanding, I dare say Tstr can explain it better.
-
• #54007
Dunno if this is what Scilly is saying but the links would all be over a greater radius of curvature so wouldn't need to be turned through as much of an angle on a bigger ring, and since theres a frictional couple in between the links and pins, surly energy would be lost in turning the links through the greater angels.
edit #1: but then the chain is moving faster so more links are being turned through the angle...
I'm sure tester will lay down the knowledge.edit #2: ^ oh, Tstr -> tester?
-
• #54009
: )
-
• #54010
edit #1: but then the chain is moving faster so more links are being turned through the angle...
I'm sure tester will lay down the knowledgeThat's what I thought
-
• #54011
-
• #54012
^ Jesus, that’s so good.
-
• #54013
I like it a lot
-
• #54014
it's not my cup of tee...
mack hubs are cool -
• #54015
I like it.
-
• #54016
It's sweet fixie baby blue ❤️
-
• #54017
That pic you linked isnt one of their race bikes. Don't think there'd be any way of finding out what cogs they used in their olympic rides.
edit- didnt go to the last page fail. ignore me
-
• #54019
When did weight weenie with road cranks become slave?
-
• #54020
Mind the miche
1 Attachment
-
• #54021
-
• #54022
hawt
-
• #54023
In a long list of bikes I wish I had never sold.
-
• #54024
that Colnago CDM is mouthwatering.
-
• #54025
Who own this one now?