Analog film photography and cameras

Posted on
Page
of 969
  • loving the kitsch 70's browns on colourplus...

    ..ha, me as well!

    Also just realised the other day that Foto Impex in Berlin sells it, for two fifty a roll, and bought some.
    It's no use without sun though so gotta wait until conditions become a bit nicer again outside..

  • @mi7rennie just picked up that roll of bw scala,
    (wasnt my intention to get the second one unsharp, somehow the camera just couldnt focus)


    4 Attachments

    • IMG_0038.jpg
    • IMG_0039.jpg
    • IMG_0035.jpg
    • IMG_0020.jpg
  • What level of automated "improvement" occurs in modern-day film processing?
    Back in the 90's when I used to send my films off to Jessop (GB) or HL Markt (D) I'd expect about 20% failure rate . nowadays everything I send to Snaps photo services is bang-on.
    I'm a bit more sober these days but even so, the majority is still sunny 16-guesswork on battered old cameras so I can't be that much improved over my 15 year digital hiatus (2000-15), particularly in view of my deteriorating eyesight...
    I'm assuming that modern day machinery automatically pushes underexposed images to make them nice - is that likely or would you need to push the entire film?
    Maybe it's just the scanners that improve everything - the metadata tells me it's a Fuji SP-3000, presumably that's where the magic takes place....

    My experience has actually been the other way around. The shots i took 10 years ago seem to be a lot more contrasty and had better colors then what i get lately. But that might just be because these days film sits forever in my camera's.

  • And three from a roll my girlfriend shot. Its the first roll of film she's ever shot.
    Handsome chap in the middle is me

  • I'm assuming that modern day machinery automatically pushes underexposed images to make them nice - is that likely or would you need to push the entire film?

    You can't push a single frame in development - the whole roll goes in the chemicals for the same length of time and temperature. In the last 20 years there have been some "improvements" in film composition/chemistry, so if you are using different films that might make a difference. 20 years ago there were also a lot of somewhat mediocrely run minilabs in the back of chemists, with chemicals not changed enough etc. But I imagine the improvements in scanning process with automatic adjusting probably make the most difference.

  • Portra and Ektar appeared in their current form from about 2010 ish.

    They were optimised for scanning. This probably makes a difference.

    Scanning makes me sad though. I’d happily donate a testicle to science for access to a full, old school colour darkroom.

  • Yashica electro35mc / vista


    1 Attachment

    • IMG_20180111_220730_794.jpg
  • @Rik_Van_Looy That's brilliant, I love that

  • demise of vista

    ..only the demise of Vista sold cheap as chips at Poundland though, it's still around, both in 200 and 400 (or as "Fuji C200" if you prefer)..

  • Sicily no?
    Love them, colours are great and the hazy nothingness of the sky sets them off nicely. I recognise that church, taormina or cefalu ?

  • I know, it was just that the effortless availability of decent quality film made it so easy to return to analogue so I felt rather bereft when it disappeared from the high street...

  • Impressive! Taormina yes. Lovely area

  • Taormina

    It's great round there. Inland from Taormina you've got the villages on the north side (freakish growing conditions for various fruit/foods). It's pretty amazing for cycling, there's the climb up from Linguaglossa (spelling?) on which Nibali trained as a sprog.

  • Indeed, happy memories...

    • minox 35al / ferrania

    1 Attachment

    • 2018-01-13_06-28-17.jpg
  • Anyone want this stuff? Untested and sat in loft for years so ‘as spares’

    A mix of Pentax and some Nikon bits. Bodies are P50 and P30 one with Pentax SMC 50mm 1.7 the other is Chinon 135mm 2.8

    £20 posted (i’m up North)


    1 Attachment

    • 77EC9BF5-53C4-4F87-A503-0948EFAFE4D6.jpeg
  • Nice! I’d take it if nobody else has first

  • I'd love the Nikon bits, want to spilt it @PhilDAS?

  • Sure, I was only really wondering if the Pentax cameras work

  • I have a Jessops light box (6x9) and a cheap loupe for freebies if anyone is interested? Missing one of the battery doors and needs a tap when you turn it on to go from dim to brighter, but it’s free and does the job. Moving at the end of the month so pickup in a week or two as I’m away this week and will use if once more when I’m back.

    Not my pic but this is what it looks like.


    1 Attachment

    • 502F2B4B-C49B-4AE0-956E-A196D17A9C78.jpeg
  • Old roll of Fuji pro 400h - age unknown, by probably pretty old/badly stored. Over expose by a stop?
    Putting it through the Halina a1 I was given.

  • Yeah, you can't go wrong with that.

  • Even when fresh, I overexposed the shit out of 400h - it suits it. Maybe shoot it as 160.

  • PhilDAS - since you were first with the dibs - let me have your address via PM and i’ll send it down for you to split as you see fit.. just stick a donation into forum rather than paying me.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Analog film photography and cameras

Posted by Avatar for GA2G @GA2G

Actions