-
• #9376
-
• #9378
Would anyone be interested in a 58cm Caad5 USA?
-
• #9379
Damn that is lovely.
-
• #9380
if cheap potentially yes
-
• #9381
I’ll PM you
-
• #9382
I have this that I don't need. £350. About 700 mi. on it and the rings. 172.5mm, 110bcd, 52,36. 109mm axle. Bearing shields and spacers for 68mm BB30 included.
-
• #9383
Aficionados of the 'dale, considering going to take a look at this supposed 2014 Supersix Evo, repainted matt black. At a glance, does this look like one or not. I'm skimming Google images but it's not so obvious. I assume there's a serial number somewhere and a format to them
1 Attachment
-
• #9384
looks like a focus
-
• #9385
Yeah it's the head tube there which has had be stumped. Doesn't look right, does look Focusy.
-
• #9386
Whats that bulgy headtube
-
• #9387
Cable guide on downtube doesn't look correct but hard to say given frame size, rear seat stay angles look kooky also
-
• #9388
That’s definitely not a Cannondale.
Headtube, seat clamp area, chain stay etc. Isn’t right.
-
• #9389
Also the stems too short and the saddle looks sad.
-
• #9390
Looks a bit like one when side by side on this
Shame you can't see the fork ends because they are a bit of a give away.
-
• #9391
Another thing looking off to me is the seatpost, looks quite thick, what diameter should it be?
-
• #9392
Look at the chain stay, very thick for a “save” chain stay, and there is no continuous line between top tube and seat stay.
-
• #9393
27.2
-
• #9394
Which means it's possibly a SuperSix, but not an Evo...
-
• #9395
Another pic.. Those seat stays towards the top, seems clearly not a supersix, afaict none have such a design do they?
1 Attachment
-
• #9396
It might be a Six. Or an early SuperSix.
But yeah who knows what it is. If it is a Dale, it's very old.
-
• #9397
That definitely looks ok more like it, not 2014 at all.
-
• #9398
NOS frame built with 105 - that neo retro practical 60cm swag
2 Attachments
-
• #9399
Definitely not a SuperSix.
-
• #9400
that nos cad3 is lovely