You are reading a single comment by @hippy and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Running does seem to be a bit better for fat loss, but it's also quite catabolic once you go over a certain amount of running a day*, cycling tends to preserve muscle mass better, according to a few experience articles from people that have been lifting and cutting weight for ages**

    • over 45 minutes or so...again it's gym talk and not hard and fast studies that would cos mega bucks.
      Marathon runners that are as muscly as sprinters tend to not exist, of course diet/genetic selection plays a role but marathon running does not preserve strength muscles as those are dead weight
      **if you care about that sort of thing obv, unless you are a gym bro, you may not want to keep that muscle I'm 7 kg over hill climbing cycling weight anyway, I'd need to take up running and trim myself down hard...
  • It also uses the wrong muscle groups for cycling, is much higher risk for overuse injury (especially as I already have a CV capacity that far outstrips my running muscles/tendons/ligaments/etc) and I don't particularly like doing it. Having said that I'd take the hundred off Dammit and run to work for shits and gigs.

About

Avatar for hippy @hippy started