-
• #25027
Oof.
-
• #25028
Does this watch look too big?
1 Attachment
-
• #25029
All watches tend to look quite large when photographed like that.
-
• #25030
Take the photo from arms length, then zoom in and crop it. Gives a better idea of how it looks.
-
• #25031
Thanks. I wish it was my watch and arm. Sadly not...
To me, it looks big on that wrist but, as mentioned, it could be camera position.
-
• #25032
Perfect size. Buy it.
-
• #25033
Thats an Aquaterra isn't it? 38.5mm?
-
• #25034
41.5mm
It is big. And too shiny.
-
• #25035
The mid sized ones are 36.2mm but I agree, way too shiny
-
• #25036
I’ve been looking at Speedmasters - are they available in different sizes? My wrists are small.
-
• #25037
No, but the modern ones are pretty modest on the wrist. Go and try one on...
-
• #25038
Thanks. I’m slightly scared to do that - I might do damage with my credit card.
-
• #25039
discount over at superdenime on this
https://www.superdenim.com/row/harrier-388-watch-olive-nylon-1.html
-
• #25040
-
• #25041
Spanking.
-
• #25042
Half tempted to put the gold coloured rice strap back on this. Been a joy to wear for a couple days.
1 Attachment
-
• #25043
Any serious Rolex geeks out there?
Just bought in a very rare Submariner.
model ref 168000 only made for 6 to 9 months. Really lovely condition, and ALL bits and pieces , box papers and even the little anchor thingy.
1988
1 Attachment
-
• #25044
Is it the one with the matte dial?
Given that Rolex sell hundreds of thousands of subs a year, how rare is it in reality?
-
• #25045
Jesus, just looking into how many Rolex sells a year. They have over 1 million COSC certified a year and not all of their models are COSC certified.
Imagine selling over a million things every year and managing to convince the world that they are still exclusive...
-
• #25046
Have you ever heard of Supreme?
-
• #25047
I don't really know what Supreme is. I always just assumed it was a bit like superdry
-
• #25048
Like that, but even drier.
-
• #25049
YESSSS!
In the modern Rolex collection, the only way to get a potentially "rare" or collectable timepiece is to stumble upon a transitional model. Thing is people wont know they've purchased a transitional model until the range gets updated...
Mostly there is no transition model, a collection is just cut and updated in one swift move.
For e.g. It kind of happened with the 16610LV, to a relatively large scale, but enough to make it somewhat a rarity, although there are actually 3 versions of the 16610LV, the first two being piss rare and £££££.
You have a bit of a mega find, you have the direct predecessor to the 16610 (made from 904L SS), the transition being the case/bracelet.
Before Rolex killed the 16800 (made from 316L SS) they made a transition - the 168000, same movement (30 series) as the 16800 but made from the advanced 904L SS instead.
The 16610 stomped in shortly after fitted with the newer 31 series movements and new grade SS.
As the years pass, the 168000 will get more collectable as that generation of Sub becomes "vintage" and because its piss rare people will want it, and will pay.
Enjoy it for a decade, then turn a profit.
-
• #25050
Surely a watch in that complete state should not be worn.
Having said that, I'd really like to get an idea for how rare it actually is. 6 months of submariner production could easily be 150,000 watches...
Also,if the 168000 is "very rare" does that mean that the red dialed version is even rarer?
I put this old thing on yesterday for the first time in a long while. Forgotten how nice it is
1 Attachment