-
• #39127
Exhaust gas recirculation should be fine to be blanked off, if it's present - it's an emissions control measure.
Secondary air injection is there to make the cats fire off sooner, so again - the only thing that takes a hit is (initial) emissions performance.
I've considered a catch can for the oil breather instead of routing it back into the intake tract but it the tradeoff in added complexity wasn't worth the (small) performance gain for me.
-
• #39128
The SAI system on this engine is so clearly an afterthought, as an engineer I hate it.
-
• #39129
Can you bin it without the management system throwing a wobbly?
-
• #39130
Looking now, if RCM make the bits I'm usually confident.
-
• #39131
Well, there's certainly one way to find out.
-
• #39132
-
• #39133
Can anyone recommend a good place to get a puncture fixed (alloy wheel might need refurbishing as I can’t find any debris) in South London?
Is Mad House tyres on OKR any Good?
-
• #39134
Fill with slime, worry about it when it comes to a tyre change.
-
• #39135
Deffo do that. Although no idea how that works on a flat 4 - more complex I imagine. But you really don't want oil vapour in the intake. More critical on direct injection cars though.
-
• #39136
Why not go aftermarket engine management?
-
• #39137
I'm not going full race car on this, I just want to remove anything that I can get away with, less little vacuum pipes to fail and less oil in my intake.
I'll be fitting a Walbro 255 and a 3 port boost solenoid, already got a full turbo back exhaust / sports cat, so just need it mapped to make the most of the exhaust and up the boost a touch.
-
• #39138
Fewer pipes, less oil.
Sorry.
-
• #39139
you're not sorry
-
• #39140
Sorry, English isn't my first language...
I'm Scottish.
-
• #39141
Is it possible to increase a car's power by changing any part of the exhaust without increasing the loudness?
Basically my catback is too loud for my tastes and if I upgrade the headers or cat to aftermarket parts too things are just going to get louder right?
-
• #39142
Put a potato in the tip....
-
• #39143
Then it will certainly chip?
-
• #39144
.
-
• #39145
Less restrictions equals higher volume, typically- and things like manifolds can change the character and tone quite a lot. Is it the volume you don't like or the noise itself?
I don't know how much room you have under a MX5 but you may be able to fit additional/larger boxes to absorb some of the volume.
-
• #39146
It's the volume I don't like, the tone is nice just a bit too loud. I did contact a local Power Flow center and they said it's always going to be loud due to the "large bore diameter", but adding a silencer could take the edge off for £180.
Being stainless swapping it for a quieter one will most likely be mild steel and cutting into my current one will make it very unattractive if I decide to sell it. There's a trolley jack and axle stand shape object under the tree so may investigate properly soon. Think I need a OE diameter exhaust but in stainless if such a thing exists.
-
• #39147
Is that the system you have fitted in the link?
You might find a contributor to volume is the 90mm tail pipe off the back of the 57mm system. You could try fitting a smaller bore tailpipe, or putting a sleeve inside it as a test -
• #39148
Yes that's the one. Good point will try a bit of experimenting with the tail pipe to see if it makes a difference. Cheers
-
• #39149
euph?
-
• #39150
Stainless sounds different to mildsteel.
Add a silencer
https://www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/performance/universal-exhaust-silencers/custom-chrome-racing-stainless-steel-cherry-bomb-silencer
And replace with a catch can?