If all the reports are from news already to there I don't see any issue with relatives coming across this thread. I think it will be a useful location to point people to so as to make the case for equity in the treatment of cyclists injured whilst not wearing a helmet.
Lawyers defending injured cyclists from a claim for contributory negligence will have a much easier task.
If all the reports are from news already to there I don't see any issue with relatives coming across this thread.
You really can't see the issue of an news article on a traumatic event, being used as an agenda for something unrelated, having any impact for those concerned?
If all the reports are from news already to there I don't see any issue with relatives coming across this thread. I think it will be a useful location to point people to so as to make the case for equity in the treatment of cyclists injured whilst not wearing a helmet.
Lawyers defending injured cyclists from a claim for contributory negligence will have a much easier task.