-
• #502
It was this one I was thinking of--someone died in that case.
-
• #503
I don't get this one at all--it's a one-way up Lancaster Terrace, how could he have crashed into that through 'not making a turn'? If he was going eastbound, he must have made too much of a turn. Is that what is meant by 'not making the turn'?
-
• #504
You can enter it from the other side, no?
-
• #505
Not Lancaster Terrace. He must have gone over the central reservation if he was travelling westbound.
Edit: Wait, I've only just spotted how bonkers the new layout is there. Now I get it. Yes, there is a westbound right turn lane. I completely failed to see that earlier. Every time I go through there I get annoyed because the scheme is so utterly rubbish.
-
• #506
It's fucking slow. Cop every light and it adds 5min to my commute. Jokes.
-
• #507
They acknowledged the fact it was driven.
Hallelujah.gif
-
• #508
Not slow enough for this guy clearly.
-
• #511
This happened near me yesterday.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/swinton-a6-crash-police-chase-14070854
1 Attachment
-
• #512
'66 plate Range Rover last night:
-
• #513
Crawl mode on this urban tank doesn't fuckin' work! I want my money back!
-
• #514
Range Rovers. Shut your eyes and drive because whatever happens me and my bratty family will be OK.
Hope the driver was injured. -
• #515
Cool. Let us know how that works out for you.
-
• #516
-
• #517
A tram derailment:
Seen here:
-
• #518
This is pretty special:
-
• #519
Odd reporting, not a word about the driver.
Edit: Aha, the image won't embed.
-
• #520
Full report here, with a short video:
This one has details of the driver's lucky escape:
The driver managed to get out, but was left dangling off the bottom of the vehicle until police could catch him, said Daniel Sanchez, who witnessed the crash.
Still typical that it was left out of the Tweet.
-
• #521
As posted by @sacredhart in the news thread a couple of days ago:
-
• #522
By way of contrast, here's a case in which someone has suffered life-threatening injuries after crashing into a lamppost:
Part of the reason why I started this thread was because I was interested in whether that evidently successful design objective of protecting people when crashing head-on into a wall, i.e. as per the ubiquitous and iconic crash test dummy images, was not insufficient given other types of crashes. The lamppost (or tree) problem that vehicles get wrapped around them seems completely unsolved (although perhaps not unaddressed, I just haven't been able to find anything conclusive on it).
-
• #523
I guess your issue will be partly that those instances where drivers crash their cars into lamposts and everyone walks away fine won't be newsworthy.
-
• #524
It's quite possible that I might gain the wrong impression, but I'm not conducting anything scientific here, so I'm not imagining I'm reaching any reliable conclusions. :)
Also, crashes into lampposts or trees are reportedly extremely rare--there are research papers on it. What I've seen so far is that most crashes into a narrow object at fairly high speed causes the vehicle to wrap itself around the obstacle and the usual protection against head-on crashes doesn't work. At lower speeds (no idea what the limit is), the car just comes to a halt, and when steering correction is still possible, this results in glancing blows.
Again, that may all be bollocks.
Bloody hell, there was a similar one a little while back.