Doping

You are reading a single comment by @Jimmy_Fingers and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

deleted in reply to @andyp

Andy - your take on Wiggins is that he had no case to answer, as he was within the letter (if not the spirit) of the rules. Now your position on Froome is that he is within the spirit of the rules. Is this a case of having your cake and eating it?

•

Jimmy_Fingers in reply to @deleted

I don't know about Andy but I haven't a clue what position to take on this. The Hutch on Twitter pointed out that Wiggins took something performance-enhancing legally while Froome has taken something that isn't illegally. This really doesn't make any sense.

•

deleted in reply to @Jimmy_Fingers

The Hutch on Twitter pointed out that Wiggins took something performance-enhancing legally while Froome has taken something that isn't illegally

That sums it up nicely.

About

Avatar for Jimmy_Fingers @Jimmy_Fingers started